Clipmarks Login
Home    Popular    New Clips

Interactive comparison of biofuels
clipped by: Geekette   1  2

 clipped from akuse.com

Biofuels: informed comparison


 clipped from akuse.com

The image “http://akuse.com/Blog/blog_pics/tech/BioFuel1.png” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 clipped from akuse.com

From National Geographic peeps comes a great multimedia piece on alternative energy. “Biofuels Compared” interactively illustrates how emerging biofuels size up and the benefits and costs of producing each one. It also shows comparison of each source’s greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance (ratio of the amount of fossil fuel required to make each biofuel to the amount of energy the biofuel itself can produce). Naturally, it uses gasoline cost and output as benchmarks. Concise audio commentary provided on each source rounds out the snapshot analysis.


 clipped from akuse.com

The image “http://akuse.com/Blog/blog_pics/tech/BioFuel2.png” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 clipped from akuse.com

http://akuse.com/Blog/blog_pics/tech/BioFuel3.png

 clipped from akuse.com

every biofuel consumes crops that could be used for food (UN says 25,000 people die of hunger every day, most under age five). However, non-food source of ethanol (eg grass as opposed to sugarcane) is currently just 45% efficient (amount of energy extractable per unit) compared to 85% for crude oil. Others see biofuels as a total waste that deters from what should be the real goal; conservation.

BioFuel4



Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

clipper's remarks: Summary & screenshots of Ntl Geographic's interactive module for comparing biofuel sources. Will it be corn, sugarcane, scum (algae) or nought? Ladies & gentlemen, place your bets!



Login to POP this clip

1 Comment
by dorine on 9-28-2007 1:19 PM
Corn will drive up cost of food, etc. There's got to be something better.